This should give Rossi much more confidence to show his invention... if it was not for his totally confusing writing.
2012/9/12 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > Jeff Berkowitz wrote: > > Isn't this sort of big deal? Not so much because of what the patent >> covers, but because the USPTO actually granted it? Claim 11, for example, >> specifically mentions charged particles and x-rays. >> > > Yes, it is a big deal. I don't know what to make of it. Perhaps the P.O. > has changed its policy. Maybe not . . . In the past, a few patents such > Patterson's got through on a technicality. I do not know what happened here. > > - Jed > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
