At 04:14 PM 9/16/2012, [email protected] wrote:
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:19:26 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>1. They appear to be different samples. It is not stated that they
>are the same reaction material, before and after. The analysis
>numbers are "07/18/12 #25 " for the "before," and " 07/18/12
>#23" " for the "after."
Since two separate analyses are required, one before, and one after, isn't it
logical that they would have different numbers?
OTOH the fact that the after analysis has a lower number appears to imply some
confusion, or someone just assigned the numbers according to a non-obvious
order.
It's simply the order in which the technician picked up and tested
the samples. The exact test method isn't given. From what Defkalion
has said, apparently, they ran at least 25 samples that day.
There are a host of questions.
The data and its intepretation are far from clear.
