Hi - I'm confused by your references. These two citations appear to be incompatible. The Berkeley paper suggests neutrinos and dark matter are identical or else neutrinos are an energetic subset of dark matter. However, neutrinos cannot "orbit" anything since they have no charge or magnetic susceptibility and only miniscule mass. Presumably, they move in a near straight line at c. most of the time.
How can a massive "particle" be composed of nearly mass-less neutrinos, and how could they orbit anything or appear to have a very large collective mass? From: ChemE Stewart [mailto:cheme...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:04 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation? Jones, I believe the Elliptical CMEs you see on the sun are made up of orbiting dark matter around the nucleus of the sun, which is also dark matter. They trigger beta decay in their surroundings, breaking up the hydrogen into protons, electrons and creating neutrinos. The elliptical CME arc at the sun is the same orbital arc the particles create on Earth while orbiting and creating low pressure systems in the atmosphere and beta decay in the Earth. Hurricane Sandy was an orbiting particle with a mass of approx 1x10e17 kg. Its beta decay triggered the large sinkhole in the Erie Canal as did Hurricane Isaac particle and the Bayou Corne sinkhole. http://astro.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/darkmatter/hdm.html http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4165 On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: This story from Purdue is of interest for several unexplained energy phenomenon, including LENR and the recent disclosure of Ed Storms. That disclosure is suggestive a hidden kind of radiation which accelerates nuclear decay rates. http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-sol <http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-so l%0d%0aar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html> ar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html A known variety of radiation which can alter decay rates is neutrinos, except for the huge problem that neutrinos should not be detected or absorbed in anywhere close to the needed amount. The undefined radiation is associated with solar flares but precedes the flare. However, since neutrinos are always present in a massive flux that is relatively independent of flares, but would not be absorbed in anything like the proportions which are required to alter decay- does this finding not specifically suggest a new kind of radiation which renders neutrinos more active (absorbable)? I think that it does suggest this or something similar, but the University Researchers involved will not go that far. (as Mel Brooks sez: we have to protect our phony baloney jobs). To me, this finding suggests that the standard neutrino flux, which is a given, can be modulated or altered somehow, so as to be absorbed at many or orders of magnitude higher rates, when the mystery radiation is present (compared to normal). That radiation can be produced in LENR apparently, as well as in the solar corona. (note: the flare is a corona feature, which is a bit different than a solar feature). In short, this mystery radiation would operate like the A-B effect - except with respect to the neutrino flux instead of with respect to charged particles. It could even be called a neutrino Aharonov-Bohm effect. QUOTE: Researchers have recorded data during 10 solar flares since 2006, seeing the same pattern...."We have repeatedly seen a precursor signal preceding a solar flare," Fischbach said. "We think this has predictive value."
