In the early 1990's, physicist Ken Shoulders received five patents for his
discovery of the High Density Charge Cluster (HDCC), "a relatively
discrete, self-contained, negatively-charged, high-density state of matter
(a bundle of electrons that) appears to be produced by the application of a
high electrical field between a cathode and an anode (i.e. 2-10 kV at the
tip of a sharply pointed electrode)." It can also be described as 'a
spherical mono pole oscillator'. Shoulders has given it the name 'Electrum
Validium' (EV), meaning strong electron. EVs have been credited with
accomplishing CF transmutations. Ken Shoulders invented also a method of
Plasma-Injected Transmutation for the remediation of nuclear waste by EVs,
and has demonstrated the complete elimination of radioactivity in
high-level nuclear material. See: Kenneth Shoulders, US Patents #5018180,
#5054047, #5123039 and #5148461

EVs apparently function as a collective accelerator with sufficient energy
to inject a large group of nuclei into a target and promote nuclear cluster
reactions. The composition of EVs allows for the inclusion of some
1,000,000 nuclides. Ions can be added to EVs until the net charge becomes
positive. Such EVs are called Nuclide-EVs (NEVs). According to shoulders:
"The NEV acts as an ultra-massive, negative ion with high charge-to-mass
ratio. This provides the function of a simple nuclear accelerator. Such
nuclear reactions are fundamentally an event involving large numbers, and
not one of widely isolated events working at an atomic level." Shoulders
offers an ad hoc explanation of these results as being "due largely to a
nuclear cluster reaction having an unknown form of coherence."

Ed Storms crack experiment may be forming high charge separation within the
crack near or at the site of transmutation that will accelerate nuclear
reactions rates.



Cheers:    axil

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

>
>                 This story from Purdue is of interest for several
> unexplained energy phenomenon, including LENR and the recent disclosure of
> Ed Storms. That disclosure is suggestive a hidden kind of radiation which
> accelerates nuclear decay rates.
>
> http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-sol
> ar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html<http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-solar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html>
>                 A known variety of radiation which can alter decay rates is
> neutrinos, except for the huge problem that neutrinos should not be
> detected
> or absorbed in anywhere close to the needed amount.
>
>                 The undefined radiation is associated with solar flares but
> precedes the flare. However, since neutrinos are always present in a
> massive
> flux that is relatively independent of flares, but would not be absorbed in
> anything like the proportions which are required to alter decay- does this
> finding not specifically suggest a new kind of radiation which renders
> neutrinos more active (absorbable)?
>                 I think that it does suggest this or something similar, but
> the University Researchers involved will not go that far. (as Mel Brooks
> sez: we have to protect our phony baloney jobs).
>                 To me, this finding suggests that the standard neutrino
> flux, which is a given, can be modulated or altered somehow, so as to be
> absorbed at many or orders of magnitude higher rates, when the mystery
> radiation is present (compared to normal). That radiation can be produced
> in
> LENR apparently, as well as in the solar corona. (note: the flare is a
> corona feature, which is a bit different than a solar feature).
>                 In short, this mystery radiation would operate like the A-B
> effect - except with respect to the neutrino flux instead of with respect
> to
> charged particles. It could even be called a neutrino Aharonov-Bohm effect.
> QUOTE: Researchers have recorded data during 10 solar flares since 2006,
> seeing the same pattern...."We have repeatedly seen a precursor signal
> preceding a solar flare," Fischbach said. "We think this has predictive
> value."
>
>

Reply via email to