On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Craig <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/13/2012 11:52 AM, Jones Beene wrote: >> You may personally not want to make this important distinction, but "cold >> fusion" obviously refers to fusion, most notably with deuterium - and this >> is only a fraction of what can be covered by LENR. The term "cold fusion" >> should be dropped for all references to NiH - unless and until there is >> arguable evidence of fusion. There is none. >> >> > > Didn't Eugene Mallove once write, when referring to pathological > skeptics, that we must keep the name 'Cold Fusion' so that we can hear > them utter the words they so dreaded, after Pons and Fleishmann have > been shown to be correct? > > Craig >
Mallove knew what it is on a poetic level: Fire from Ice. The rest is just science. ;-) Harry
