The excess power estimate of the test run is based on a higher temperature reading of the outer surface of the glass as compared to a lower temperature reading during the calibration runs
However, someone named ECCO has noticed that the temperature of the inner glass surface is the same in the both the test run and the calibration runs: http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/177-write-up-of-eu-cell-baselines If the higher temperature on the outer surface is not an artifact, wouldn't you expect the inner surface temperature to be somewhat higher as well? harry
