Sorry, I don't.
harry
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:
> This information may have originated from my simulation model of Rossi's
> device. I have written about it on several posts in the past, but I do not
> recall that he supports the idea. It would be interesting if you know of a
> reference from Rossi where he acknowledges that these two critical
> temperatures exist.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Wed, Dec 19, 2012 6:21 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:So what has been discovered is not a new source of
> energy....
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I maybe be wrong but I think you told us his original plan was to first
>>> raise the temperature of the cell. That would have been consistent with
>>> how
>>> the E-cat operates,
>>> which supposedly begins to produce heat at a certain temperature but
>>> doesn't become (temporarily) self-sustaining until a higher temperature
>>> is
>>> reached.
>>
>>
>> I do not recall hearing that from Celani. You are saying that Rossi
>> reports
>> two different critical temperatures? One at which the reaction begins, and
>> another, higher temperature at which it self-sustains? If that is how it
>> works, that's interesting.
>
> I thought the data in the Essen/Kullander report suggested that is how
> the E-Cat performs .
> Maybe I am recalling incorrectly.
>
>
> Harry
>
