Dear Friends,

I gladly take the respondibility for the Question, it had a beneficial
effect on Vortex because it has generated a long thread dedicated to LENR.
The discussions were as usual 80% (Pareto, see my Blog) parallel monologs
but have revealed some interesting opinions and condensates of opinions. It
was like Chicken Soup for Soul to me because I have long ago accepted the
Forum suffers from Detailitis and Dilutitis but in the last months evil &
destructive forces have caused Disfocusitis or Subject alienation that can
be fatal for a discussion group.

As regarding the question I have waited a completely different, predictive
answer as: 2015, 2020, 2025 etc
The question was purely rhetoric, I am a good bureaucrat and I know
somebody will put LENR on the list of Great Invention when LENR will
demonstrate in practice for more years that it gives something (perceived
as) good for the Mankind. In other words when LENR will become a positive
meme.
Special thanks for Mark who gave an inspiring however over-optimistic
answer an old truth is:"Theoria sine praxis sicut rota sine axis"
Science plus technology plus smart busines will
bring LENR on that List.


My duty as LENR dedicated blogger is to write:
"LENR OUTLOOK 2013" and I intend to publish
exactly when the new year will arrive, locally.
Please help me with *anticipated comments.*
The leit-motif of this writing is, as natural, Paradigm Shift.

Thank you,
Peter






On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, take a look at this paper, which was presented this month in JCF13
> earlier this month:
>
> http://vixra.org/abs/1209.0057
>
> Not after the fusion, but well, some ideas of what might happen during
> fusion.
>
>
> 2012/12/30 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com>
>
>>
>> He's only analyzed the symmetrical 4-body problem. Takahashi has *not*
>> detailed what happens after fusion.
>
>
> --
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> danieldi...@gmail.com
>



-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to