~The PLASMA BREACH (Bagel-Body) Gyro-Toroidal REACTOR~ * * *CHEER UP VOTEX! WE MADE HISTORY! OUR 'CONVERSATIONS' 'finally-duh' BROUGHT THESE NEW TECHNOLOGIES TO LIGHT! . . . cool no!?! ~:) Ha. . . it's about time. . . duh~;) ~This 'video' pretty well nailed it~ NOTE RE: CERN-HADRON defacto Plasma-Breach-Reactor design: search: Jake Lev Harbach(me)//General Science Journal
REACTOR DESIGN: 'Think' plasma disk between Mag-Bowl configuation. In that disk-plane place BOSE-EINSTEIN(bagel body) SUPERCONDUCTOR STATIONARY RING. THEN sleeve this ring with a Quasi-Tesla-coil 'independently firing' HIGH DENSITY-EM CAROSELL RING ARRAY.(each 'ring' in array fired by its own separate HIGH-DENSITY CAPACITOR. This also engineered to FIRE in REVERSE ORDER to SHUT DOWN-reverse(in emergency especially) the REACTOR. THEN flip the magnetic 'bowels' they control the POINT-LEAD incoming/ingress AEXO-DARK-SPACE plasma. THE CAROSEL RING ARRAY FIRING/FREQUENCY is then initiated and the BOSE-EINSTEIN BAGEL-TOROIDAL-FIELD SUPER-CONDUCTOR ring BUILDS THE QUANTUM FIELD density to initiate a PARALLEL AEXO-DARK-SPACE adjacent Gyro-Toroidal field. This is called TRANSPECTRUM/TRANSDIMENSIONAL FIELD VISCOSITY. Obviously we have to apply a fairly MASSIVE HIGH-DENSITY EM input to ACHIEVE TRANSPECTRUM FIELD VISCOSITY. THUS THE parallel AexoDarkSpace gyro toroid does the 'heavy lifting' and 'BEGINS' to open the EINSTEIN-ROSEN GATE between the BAGEL-TOROID-EYE of our reactor and our 'kickstarted' AexoDarkSpace HYPER-SPEED-DENSE/HYPERGRAVIONIC ingress field. CRUCIAL and the mere BARE-BEGINNING of the 'OPEN BREACH STATUS' our REACTOR SHUT DOWN INPUT PHASE and INVERTS into being the INDUCED HIGH-DENSITY EM FIELD-DRAG(infinite power havesting self-sustaining phase). THEN: If the PLASMA-BREACH 'eye-gate' Einstein-Rosen connection reaches FULL-OPEN EINSTEIN-ROSEN CONNECTION outside of a vaccum then SPONTANEOUS HYDROGEN-CREATION AND FUSION WILL COMMENCE. . . really not good. HENSE the REVERSE Carosel Ring Array High-Density Capacitor reverse order firing sequence to CHOKE DOWN the Plasma-Breach to mere INCIPIENT-INGRESS LEVEL OF CONSTANT OPERATION or FULL SHUT DOWN. TRICKY: The AXIAL FIELD INGRESS field lobe(s) of this GYRO-TOROIDAL VORTEX is HYPER GRAVIONIC and the INVERSE-MAG-BOWEL configuration(to the you-tube video) is exactly the STEERING-DIRECTING MECHANISM when this Plasma Breach Reactor is used as a POINT-LEAD FOCUSED GRAVITY PROPULSION SYSTEM. THE HADRON COLLIDER & Fermi-lab etc.: Tend to 'roughly-approximate' this Plasma-Breach configuation en-masse. IF those PARTICLE-ACCELERATORS rather had their CORE-TRACK centred with a BOSE-EINSTEIN SUPER-CONDUCTOR CORE they would then function as a FULL PLASMA BREACH REACTOR. . . A profound GRAVITATIONAL SUMP and INGRESS AEXOPLASMA-PHENOMENON would be observable easily if that were the case. NOTE: BEING UNDERGROUND tends to DISSIPATE this tendency BECAUSE THE COLLIDER-HIGH-DENSITY EM-MAG-TRACK 'partially' acts as a PLASMA-BREACH VORTEX REACTOR inadvertantly ANYWAY. THE ingress GRAVIONIC-LOBE(Aexo-Plasma Bleed-through) SUMP EFFECT HAS BEEN OBSERVED ABOVE FERMI & HADRON etc. . . BOTTOM LINE: This you-tube video is expressly made available to DEBUT' these new technologies to the planet. . . hense the 'plausible' rationale' as to 'how' we 'discovered' these 'phenomenon.' (?NOTICE THE PATENTS ANYBODY?~;) CHEER UP VOTEX! WE MADE HISTORY! OUR 'CONVERSATIONS' 'finally-duh' BROUGHT THESE NEW TECHNOLOGIES TO LIGHT! . . . cool no!?! ~:) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:18:30 -0600 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rules for Unconventional Research, and Shaking Current Theories to the Core. From: jabow...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com So-called "confirmation bias" must have had some adaptive value. I wonder what it was or perhaps even is? On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: This document by Bill Beaty is well worth reviewing, if the reader is not familiar with it. http://amasci.com/freenrg/rules1.html This doesn't just apply to inventors. Similar phenomena happen with pseudoskeptics, and *who isn't pseudoskeptical* on occasion, at least? A genuine skeptic does not forget to be skeptical of self. Bill lays out the psychology quite well. I received today an announcement of a remarkable video. ["Kim Sand," salsasas3996@ ...] wrote, to a list of prominent Vo participants: In this video series the currently accepted theories of physics and astrophysics are shaken to the core by a radical new theory of the fundamental forces in all matter. You will be amazed as a magnetic model of the dome at CERN is used to create a 100 mm diameter plasma Sun with a 300 mm diameter equatorial disc of plasma around it! All the plasma videos are actual footage with no enhancement or manipulation other than speed. In other words, this is real thing. Hard to believe, but it is all true. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EPlyiW-xGI (I had no problem believing that the videos were real and not fake, though, of course, some are "constructed." Not a problem.) The basic test device that LaPoint uses is a thing of wonder, the kind of thing I'd have spent months playing with when I was young. The astrophysical images are beautiful, the video is eye candy. The video had the best production values I've seen in the alternative science field. Yet my mind was screaming at me, "Pseudoscience!"! Maybe. Maybe he has found something. However, I see nothing like an adequate explanation of the experimental *basis* for his theory, and I certainly don't see the attitude that Bill is pointing to, an attitude of self-skepticism. I see no specific testable predictions (the lack of such is a basic characteristic of "pseudoscience"). What it looks to me like is that the theorist has discovered, in fact, a *pattern* that matches many phenomena. He hasn't shown how this pattern explains *anything*. At least not to me! I'm reminded of the claims of Rashad Khalifa, whom I knew. He believed he had found a pattern in letter and word frequencies in the Qur'an. I know almost exactly what led him to that, there was a minor statistical anomaly that he'd discovered. As soon as he believed that the anomaly was real evidence of a hidden message, he started to see it more and more. He became convinced that he had made a monumental discovery, that, in fact, he was specially chosen by God to deliver this to the world. He paid with his life for this belief. I was able, years later, when he was assassinated and I tried to verify his work, to see exactly what he had done. Counting words and letters in the Qur'an is nowhere near as simple as people might think, one must make choices. He made the choices that confirmed his pattern. That was, in his mind, the "correct way to count." But every time he made such a choice, he constrained future choices. Eventually, when he still found "contradictions" to his theory (based on discovered counting errors in his prior claims), he started to "correct" the text of the Qur'an to match his theory. And he always found some excuse for his choices or his later "corrections." The human mind is a pattern-recognition machine, a very efficient and powerful one. We can readily find patterns in random data. For a scientific theory, we must do more than see a pattern. We must then, from the pattern we have detected, make predictions that can test the pattern, and we must keep thinking about how we might be wrong, rather than about how we might be right. Bill gets it right. The "scientific" explorer works as hard as possible to *refute* the new discovery, and documents that work meticulously. Because the *mind* -- which very much wants to be "successful," and we love to be "right" -- will forget all contrary evidence and only remember confirmation.
