Close, we are all just holographic projections on the surface of black holes, see Verlinde's entropic theory of gravity
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Verlinde :) On Monday, January 21, 2013, David Roberson wrote: > Cheme, one day you will be drawn into one of those black holes and become > a surface feature. [image: :-)] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'vortex-l@eskimo.com');>> > Sent: Mon, Jan 21, 2013 8:32 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]: Magnetic Not Gravitational > > Cool, you are coming around then > > On Monday, January 21, 2013, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: > >> I think also the economical crisis could be explained by black hole >> coalescence of entropical annihilating forces of gravitational interstellar >> currents. >> >> Giovanni >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:24 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> In My Model Earth Recharges its Core Battery through black hole >>> coalescence. >>> >>> http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.1338 >>> >>> Only about 3% of the entropy gets annihilated and gets shot out the >>> auroras >>> >>> In other words our weather systems are recharging our Earth's core >>> battery and cooling the core slightly as it takes on some additional mass. >>> As it radiates it slowly heats back up. >>> >>> Weird thing is that back as far as 2002 I think we were being shown >>> this coalescence and ring-down phase in crop circles >>> >>> http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/videolibrary/group%202.html >>> >>> We are part of a much larger entropic organism and are equivalent to >>> some bacteria growing in the 5% crust. The streaming dark matter through >>> the universe are the tendrils connecting it all and transferring >>> electromagnetic and gravitational flux. >>> >>> >>> Stewart >>> Darkmattersalot.com >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:36 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Is eddy currents the proper description to use in this case? It would >>>> seem that a system that is self sustaining due to some form of feedback >>>> would be more of a generator instead of a loss mechanism as eddy currents >>>> are generally considered. >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com> >>>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>>> Sent: Mon, Jan 21, 2013 5:41 pm >>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Magnetic Not Gravitational >>>> >>>> The magnetism in the inner core is explained in terms of Eddy >>>> currents, an induction effect. >>>> Sun has a magnetic field that is produced by plasma currents inside its >>>> core. >>>> >>>> Giovanni >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Fe, without it's electrons, is not magnetic. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
