Is it related to the theory proposed in that report http://webbshop.cm.se/System/TemplateView.aspx?p=Energimyndigheten&view=default&id=6d5bbc764d4942c89612bc9c5a9c4990
it seems different, but the orbiting of 2 nucleus together seems a common point 2013/1/22 <mix...@bigpond.com> > In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:09:37 -0500 > (EST): > Hi, > [snip] > >Eric, the theory as you describe it is quite unusual. I understand > energy release of this nature as being due to an isomer transition within > the nucleus. Is that what is being proposed? We should review the charts > and see if there are know isomers of nickel which might be contributing to > the energy source. If none are known to science so far, perhaps Piantellii > and his partners have found a new one. > > The idea of a negative hydride ion displacing an electron and orbiting > close to > the nucleus is something I posited on this list several years back, in > relation > to "Hydrino hydride". We were talking about an exchange between K & Ar. > > Perhaps Piantelli is seeing some evidence of this, and doesn't know what > he's > looking at. > > I have also on occasion suggested that a Hydrino might get close to another > nucleus, and the shrunken electron might "jump ship" to the target nucleus > (as > it has a higher central charge than the proton), taking up a new even > tighter > orbit around the new nucleus than it did around the proton. This process > would > release a considerable amount of energy, and the proton left over from the > Hydrino would be expected to be ejected from the atom, probably carrying > much, > if not all, of that energy. > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
