David,
I have not been following your evaluation closely, but I have done a
lot of calorimetry in my life. The ONLY way a calorimeter can be
tested is to use it without any source of excess energy being present.
That means you need to run the calorimeter in the planned way with the
Celani wire replaced by an inert wire of the same resistance. When
you do this, you will quickly discover how the calorimeter behaves and
what is required to achieve a null. Other people are suggesting the
same method. As long as the Celani wire is present, the results will
be confused by the potential excess.
Ed
On Feb 7, 2013, at 8:42 AM, David Roberson wrote:
I am positive that two equal and opposite dummy signals would cancel
each other out. Is that what you mean?
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>
To: John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thu, Feb 7, 2013 10:37 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]: MFMP Null Result
No, what I mean is that you could try to make a dummy, a fake data
and input that into the program and see if you can hide a positive,
dummy, signal.
2013/2/7 David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>
If you are suggesting that there should be LENR activity and thus a
reading of zero excess power is a false negative, then the program
demonstrates that. It is my philosophy to let the results speak for
themselves regardless of the outcome. The program does that by
fitting the input power variable to the data for the best match. I
have no way to change this once it has been told to optimize unless
I intentionally lock its value for other purposes.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
