Rob Dingemans <manonbrid...@aim.com> wrote:
> In my opinion is what Andrea has discovered "to good to be true" and > therefore most people won't accept Andrea's findings, even when it bites > them in their noses. > I disagree. Many people would believe him without reservations if he would only do a proper test. His results are not surprising to someone familiar with this field. His device is qualitatively the same as the others, albeit quantitatively better. All cold fusion experiments are "too good to be true." I discussed this in my book, on p. 10, starting: "Some skeptics feel that cold fusion must be too good to be true. They suspect that cold fusion researchers are guilty of wishful thinking. They should remember Michael Faraday’s dictum: 'Nothing is too wonderful to be true if it be consistent with the laws of nature.' Mankind has discovered countless wonderful things that ancient people would have thought miraculous. . . ." - Jed
