I am not sure anyone has a good answer to your question Ed. I do not care what theory they are operating upon at the moment as long as they keep plugging away. One day we might be able to set them straight, but that will not happen if they give up too soon. Encourage them in any way that you can for now.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Cc: Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> Sent: Fri, Feb 15, 2013 3:08 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:ANS Nuclear Cafe: Short interview with Zawodny I added the following comment: The experimental approach and the intention for applying LENR in space should be be admired. The problem is with the theory being explored. This theory is flawed in so many ways, all of which have been well explained in published papers, that I’m amazed that NASA would seriously explore the idea. Many other explanations have much better consistency with observed behavior and with basic physics. Why is a universally rejected theory being used by NASA is my question? Ed On Feb 15, 2013, at 12:13 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: > > Friday Nuclear Matinee: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions > > The ANS Nuclear Cafe today brings faithful viewers a short interview > with > Dr. Joseph M. Zawodny, senior research scientist at NASA Langley > Research > Center. Zawodny discusses research on “Low Energy Nuclear Reactions” > at > NASA Langley, and the incredible potential of this new form of nuclear > power—IF theory is validated by experimental results. > > http://ansnuclearcafe.org/2013/02/15/nuclear-matinee-low-energy-nuclear-reactions/ > >
