It was just a horrible blunder. Even I got the number and the yield of the explosion right. Just look at the beginning of this thread.
2013/2/20 ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> > You, like NASA, are off by at least a factor of 1000... > > > http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/02/19/russian-meteorite-1000-times-bigger-than-originally-thought/ > > Of course maybe it was just diffuse plasma. > > Stewart > Darkmattersalot.com > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Eric Walker wrote: > >> On Feb 20, 2013, at 4:49, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > It is interesting to note that the complete works of Shakespeare must >> > also occur in Pi somewhere. (irrational, non ending and non >> > repetitive >> >> I suspect there is an invalid assumption about randomness that we are >> making when we go along with the old thought experiment of a corps of >> eternally typing monkeys eventually producing Shakespeare's folio or >> imagining that the folio can be found at some point transcoded in the >> decimals of Pi. I wonder if there is already a mathematical proof out there >> to the effect that the latter is an impossibility. >> >> I have not seen the video, but what has been described could possibly be >> due to parallax with the frame of reference of the camera and arising in >> connection with a piece of the meteor that split off at some point during >> entry. >> >> I doubt the gravitational field of a ten ton meteor is strong enough to >> keep much in an orbit of any kind. >> >> Eric >> > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
