The biggest blunder is having an object hurdling at you @ 60,000 mph with
the ability to take out a city and not even realizing it.
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> It was just a horrible blunder. Even I got the number and the yield of the
> explosion right. Just look at the beginning of this thread.
>
>
> 2013/2/20 ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'cheme...@gmail.com');>>
>
>> You, like NASA, are off by at least a factor of 1000...
>>
>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/02/19/russian-meteorite-1000-times-bigger-than-originally-thought/
>>
>> Of course maybe it was just diffuse plasma.
>>
>> Stewart
>> Darkmattersalot.com
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Eric Walker wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 20, 2013, at 4:49, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > It is interesting to note that the complete works of Shakespeare must
>>> > also occur in Pi somewhere. (irrational, non ending and non
>>> > repetitive
>>>
>>> I suspect there is an invalid assumption about randomness that we are
>>> making when we go along with the old thought experiment of a corps of
>>> eternally typing monkeys eventually producing Shakespeare's folio or
>>> imagining that the folio can be found at some point transcoded in the
>>> decimals of Pi. I wonder if there is already a mathematical proof out there
>>> to the effect that the latter is an impossibility.
>>>
>>> I have not seen the video, but what has been described could possibly be
>>> due to parallax with the frame of reference of the camera and arising in
>>> connection with a piece of the meteor that split off at some point during
>>> entry.
>>>
>>> I doubt the gravitational field of a ten ton meteor is strong enough to
>>> keep much in an orbit of any kind.
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> danieldi...@gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'danieldi...@gmail.com');>
>
