Can he build me a P-08 luger? I would like to have one of these to collect. They have a great appearance. All kidding aside, this is going to be a problem in the future.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Mon, Feb 25, 2013 7:03 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:The limits of 3-D replicators "The strength of 3D-printed titanium can equal that of the traditionally machined metal, says Dan Johns, who is printing strong, lightweight metal parts for Bloodhound SSC, the rocket car aiming to break the land-speed record in 2013." http://www.uasvision.com/2011/08/01/worlds-first-unmanned-aircraft-built-by-3d-printer/ On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: I wrote: It seems unlikely to me that anyone will be able to fabricate a cold fusion device at home, using 3-D printers or what-have-you. Not for the next thousand years or so, until those machines evolve into Clarke's universal replicators. Maybe 1,000 years is too much, but it will be a long while. There has been a lot of enthusiastic talk about these 3-D printer replicator things. I am all for them! I think they are great. But I think some naive commentators fail to recognize some crucial limitations to today's versions: 1. They use only material. Plastic. They cannot be used to fabricate metal, wood, silicon or nickel. You cannot make a NiCad battery or a cold fusion device with that. 2. Resolution is limited. You could not make a computer chip, even if the devices could lay down silicon and metal. I do not think resolution is fine enough for a cold fusion device. Certainly not nanoparticle devices. Despite these limitations, I expect these things will become useful for making parts in the lab such as the fitting that holds the cathode and anode in place. In the distant future, the capabilities of these machines may gradually expand, until they can lay down any element in any configuration. Such as, for example: a fried egg, the Hope Diamond, a copy of the Mona Lisa correct down to the molecule, or a thermonuclear bomb. That is what Clarke predicted. By the time that happens we can hope that the machines will have so much built-in intelligence, it will refuse to fabricate a thermonuclear bomb. The process will be so complicated that no human will be able to override the build-in protections, or run the machine manually. - Jed
