The experimenter said: "Throughout the course of the experiment a few nanoantennas became inactive, most likely due to photodegradation of the probe molecules."
No, the probe molecules got transmuted. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > We are suggesting LENR with this level of power concentration. > > > This is just the beginning. > > As stated in the study, the experimental techniques used there were at a > disadvantage in maximizing the enhancement of EMF for a couple of reasons. > > First, laser excitation of the nanoparticles is poor at producing the > resonance pattern that generates the most enhancements. From the document, > it states. > > “A dipole within the near-field of the nanoparticles allows for excitation > of plasmon resonances, which are difficult to excite with plane wave > irradiation.” > > A laser produces plane wave irradiation only; on the other hand, dipole > excitation will really get the enhancement rolling. The only way that the > experimenters got the enhancement up to as high as it eventually got was to > produce secondary excitement using the laser to pump up a dipole emitter > close to the hot spot. > > Another problem for the experimenters was that the enhancement is most > powerful at longer wavelengths into the deeper infrared than the > experimenters could produce. The lasers used by the experimenter could not > get that deep into the infrared. > > The most enhancements came from nanoparticles that were connected by a sub > Nano scale solid connection between the nanoparticles. > > When there is some space between the particles, power is broadcast like a > radio station to far places. This is called far field radiation. > > When the particles were connected by a thin channel of material, a > resonance process forces all the EMF into the region between the > nanoparticles. This is called near field radiation. > > The most powerful nano-particles emitters look like a dumbbell with the > thinnest possible thread to connect them. > > In this case, little radiation escaped to the far field. > > I speculate that if the experiment was run using the optimum infrared > radiation wavelength and the properly connected nanoparticles, the system > could increase its enhancement levels by a few more orders of magnitude > into the billions or trillions. > > You can see that a well-built LENR system has all the prerequisites to > produce a very powerful infrared and electron current enhancements because > of its dipole radiation profile. > > It also looks like there is a Bose-Einstein condensation process going on > to pump up the EMF enhancements to these huge levels > > This is LENR, Dave > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:46 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: > >> Give me a hint Axil. The enhanced field suggests to me that the activity >> might approach hot fusion conditions. Please elaborate. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Thu, Mar 28, 2013 11:41 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Why not expect fusion in metals to be different? >> >> >> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CD4QFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.castl.uci.edu%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2FSingle%2520Nanoparticle%2520SERES_Galley%2520Proof_121712.pdf&ei=kslFUYK3I8eX0QH9u4DwCQ&usg=AFQjCNE52ebdjSPkC101MgD1Obse3dYAvA&sig2=h58oP-5AUJVw13xOhIhVEw >> Structure Enhancement Factor Relationships in Single Gold Nanoantennas by >> Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy >> In the parlance of Nanoplasmonics, a crack can be considered a >> nanoantenna. >> A optimally configured nanoantenna can amplify incoming EMF in the >> infrared range by a factor of 500,000,000. >> I am showing you the path. What will you do with it? >> >> Cheers: axil >> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:20 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: >> >>> I was thinking of something unusual this afternoon that I wanted to >>> discuss. My mind wandered into thoughts about cold fusion within metals >>> when It occurred to me that the hot fusion crowd was being very >>> presumptuous to expect the same behavior during fusion reactions occurring >>> within a metal matrix as is measured within a plasma. The environment is >>> extremely different in these two cases and it seems to be out of line to >>> extrapolate a system to this degree. For instance, the density of the >>> reaction components is vastly different. The kinetic energy of these same >>> nuclei could hardly be further apart either. And, it is well known that >>> the hot fusion involves a plasma while cold fusion appears to work with >>> normal atoms. >>> >>> Why would it not be a miracle if both types of behavior were similar? >>> Who could have confidence that a fusion reaction taking place within the >>> low temperature confines of a metal matrix would restrict the release of >>> its nuclear energy to just the reacting particles and not include other >>> very nearby atoms? This seems like a serious lack of imagination and >>> insight. >>> >>> So, I have a question that seeks an answer. Is anyone aware of proof >>> that hot fusion types of reactions have been observed within the confines >>> of a metal matrix that is not subject to very massive energy inputs? For >>> example, it would be too similar to a hot fusion environment to allow the >>> reaction atoms to be accelerated by an electric field and rammed into a >>> metal target. For this exercise I think we should restrict the processes >>> to include cases where fusion is detected within the surface of the metal >>> and without significant external energy inputs. >>> >>> Take the example of cold fusion that is initiated by muons. Have >>> there been any situations where this has been observed while the hydrogen >>> is contained within a metal? If so, what ash was observed and were gammas >>> emitted by the process? Perhaps an interesting test would be to infiltrate >>> a mixture of deuterium and tritium into a nickel or palladium matrix and >>> allow muons to enter the fray. Someone may have already attempted this and >>> it would be most informative for them to list the nuclear products that >>> have been measured since this would simulate to a degree what we are >>> expecting to observe with a typical cold fusion reaction. Would this test >>> result in the generation of gammas? In what form would the energy be >>> released? >>> >>> I realize that the addition of tritium might blur the results, >>> particularly when the normal cold fusion processes do not contain it. For >>> this reason, it might be interesting to only use regular hydrogen and >>> deuterium at a lower expected reaction rate. I am most interested in >>> determining whether or not the reaction energy is distributed among the >>> local atoms or confined to the ones undergoing fusion as is seen in hot >>> fusion. >>> >>> I would appreciate any responses from vortex members who have >>> knowledge concerning these questions. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >> >
