Perhaps that is the solution. The magnitude of the LENR released energy is still too small for them to realize it is happening.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Fri, Mar 29, 2013 12:12 am Subject: Re: [Vo]: Why not expect fusion in metals to be different? The experimenter said: "Throughout the course of the experiment a few nanoantennas became inactive, most likely due to photodegradation of the probe molecules." No, the probe molecules got transmuted. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: We are suggesting LENR with this level of power concentration. This is just the beginning. As stated in the study, the experimental techniques used there were at a disadvantage in maximizing the enhancement of EMF for a couple of reasons. First, laser excitation of the nanoparticles is poor at producing the resonance pattern that generates the most enhancements. From the document, it states. “A dipole within the near-field of the nanoparticles allows for excitation of plasmon resonances, which are difficult to excite with plane wave irradiation.” A laser produces plane wave irradiation only; on the other hand, dipole excitation will really get the enhancement rolling. The only way that the experimenters got the enhancement up to as high as it eventually got was to produce secondary excitement using the laser to pump up a dipole emitter close to the hot spot. Another problem for the experimenters was that the enhancement is most powerful at longer wavelengths into the deeper infrared than the experimenters could produce. The lasers used by the experimenter could not get that deep into the infrared. The most enhancements came from nanoparticles that were connected by a sub Nano scale solid connection between the nanoparticles. When there is some space between the particles, power is broadcast like a radio station to far places. This is called far field radiation. When the particles were connected by a thin channel of material, a resonance process forces all the EMF into the region between the nanoparticles. This is called near field radiation. The most powerful nano-particles emitters look like a dumbbell with the thinnest possible thread to connect them. In this case, little radiation escaped to the far field. I speculate that if the experiment was run using the optimum infrared radiation wavelength and the properly connected nanoparticles, the system could increase its enhancement levels by a few more orders of magnitude into the billions or trillions. You can see that a well-built LENR system has all the prerequisites to produce a very powerful infrared and electron current enhancements because of its dipole radiation profile. It also looks like there is a Bose-Einstein condensation process going on to pump up the EMF enhancements to these huge levels This is LENR, Dave On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:46 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: Give me a hint Axil. The enhanced field suggests to me that the activity might approach hot fusion conditions. Please elaborate. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Mar 28, 2013 11:41 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]: Why not expect fusion in metals to be different? http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CD4QFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.castl.uci.edu%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2FSingle%2520Nanoparticle%2520SERES_Galley%2520Proof_121712.pdf&ei=kslFUYK3I8eX0QH9u4DwCQ&usg=AFQjCNE52ebdjSPkC101MgD1Obse3dYAvA&sig2=h58oP-5AUJVw13xOhIhVEw Structure Enhancement Factor Relationships in Single Gold Nanoantennas by Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy In the parlance of Nanoplasmonics, a crack can be considered a nanoantenna. A optimally configured nanoantenna can amplify incoming EMF in the infrared range by a factor of 500,000,000. I am showing you the path. What will you do with it? Cheers: axil On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:20 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: I was thinking of something unusual this afternoon that I wanted to discuss. My mind wandered into thoughts about cold fusion within metals when It occurred to me that the hot fusion crowd was being very presumptuous to expect the same behavior during fusion reactions occurring within a metal matrix as is measured within a plasma. The environment is extremely different in these two cases and it seems to be out of line to extrapolate a system to this degree. For instance, the density of the reaction components is vastly different. The kinetic energy of these same nuclei could hardly be further apart either. And, it is well known that the hot fusion involves a plasma while cold fusion appears to work with normal atoms. Why would it not be a miracle if both types of behavior were similar? Who could have confidence that a fusion reaction taking place within the low temperature confines of a metal matrix would restrict the release of its nuclear energy to just the reacting particles and not include other very nearby atoms? This seems like a serious lack of imagination and insight. So, I have a question that seeks an answer. Is anyone aware of proof that hot fusion types of reactions have been observed within the confines of a metal matrix that is not subject to very massive energy inputs? For example, it would be too similar to a hot fusion environment to allow the reaction atoms to be accelerated by an electric field and rammed into a metal target. For this exercise I think we should restrict the processes to include cases where fusion is detected within the surface of the metal and without significant external energy inputs. Take the example of cold fusion that is initiated by muons. Have there been any situations where this has been observed while the hydrogen is contained within a metal? If so, what ash was observed and were gammas emitted by the process? Perhaps an interesting test would be to infiltrate a mixture of deuterium and tritium into a nickel or palladium matrix and allow muons to enter the fray. Someone may have already attempted this and it would be most informative for them to list the nuclear products that have been measured since this would simulate to a degree what we are expecting to observe with a typical cold fusion reaction. Would this test result in the generation of gammas? In what form would the energy be released? I realize that the addition of tritium might blur the results, particularly when the normal cold fusion processes do not contain it. For this reason, it might be interesting to only use regular hydrogen and deuterium at a lower expected reaction rate. I am most interested in determining whether or not the reaction energy is distributed among the local atoms or confined to the ones undergoing fusion as is seen in hot fusion. I would appreciate any responses from vortex members who have knowledge concerning these questions. Dave
