That is interesting, since you felt the other one. So maybe the one designed to be more 'material' rather than just stronger is just that.
Anyway while it is self serving to agree so fully with your correlation, you are very correct. That many can see it in one area and not in another is a problem (i.e most of this list despite it being anti-skeptic). With the aether I fully understand the prejudice against it. If a mind wants to understand the universe logically, it seeks simplicity, not a dynamical flu. So while a fluid just like what I am certain exists was assumed, those interested in physics felt that a static aether was was so much more attractively simple to understand. So they looked for the evidence of a lumiferious aether through which the earth passes and found none. But SR despite being a total minf*ck was accepted because it could all be cleanly worked out mathematically. Now if you look too close there are flaws, but why look so close when the alternative is a messy entrained aether? Of course evidence keeps coming up for many aether like qualities to space. Ok, so that is how we got here, but why is evidence for new things rejected so fully as to not even be looked at. Clearly such a system is rifefor abuse since only those at the top can propose something new and have it accepted. "Science progresses funeral by funeral." - Max Planck But what about cold fusion? Why does it get the cold shoulder of pathological skepticism? It does not have the unattractively messy dynamics of a fluid to contend with. It seems the only reason other than a distrust of newness perhaps (compared with Nuclear's initial development) would be that science can be controlled by vested interests. So how well is closed minded science that can only be changed from the top doing? Not so well. How much do people like being ridiculed? Well if you step out of line we will fire you and make you look like one of those kooks. And we have a control system, science is no longer science, it is what is allowed based on whoever pulls the strings. Of course once people have been trained to think in such ways, changing isn't easy. Religious people will often die for their beliefs. I heard that physicists have killed themselves on finding the constants were not so constant. Once set in motion, little is required to maintain this. Close mindedness (literally *ignore*ance) once established as a belief system will keep out any new developments if it is at all possible to ignore them. Even when those above do die, it progresses only very slowly. Considering it as a manipulation by those in power is scary, but considering it going on automatically is worse. Hoyt, you are in the minority on this list publically disclosing you can feel it, more I think have only been willing to say this in private. John On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. <hoyt-stea...@cox.net>wrote: > I didn't feel anything from the new top image with a brief test.**** > > ** ** > > Regardless of whether there's anything to this or not, it seems like a > good metaphor the feelings of most scientists**** > > towards LENR ( or any other new paradigm ). Most "know" there's nothing > to it, so won't even bother to investigate,**** > > or worse, will debunk it.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* John Berry [mailto:berry.joh...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 24, 2013 6:51 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:New image, and site**** > > ** ** > > Well that is a pretty good result, Reload the page and recheck the top > image for me, I improved it.**** > > ** ** > > Anyway, to your question, that particular one is based on an angle that I > discovered I was holding my fingers on.**** > > I tried to work out what it was and it seemed that 360/14= 25.714 deg > worked best.**** > > So that angle plays a major part, additionally I have a gradient of > luminance based on a number pattern the energy seems drawn to.**** > > Simply 1, 1+2=3, 1+2+3=6 and so on. giving a series of 1,3,6, 10, 15 and > so on.**** > > ** ** > > Inside the circle the ratio of some pixels is 137 to 1 which gives a fine > structure ratio.**** > > ** ** > > The thing that looks like a collection of Egyptian Ankh stuck together is > based of an accidental discovery as I was putting a pin in my watch, I > noted energy was hitting me, the wire I was using was entering the pin > which is folded in 2, so the energy shoots back out interrupting the input > flow.**** > > ** ** > > This creates strong pressure.**** > > ** ** > > Additionally I use green to stop energy, as an insulator, this might be > why plants are mostly green to capture the suns energy.**** > > If this is because it is in the middle of the visual spectrum I don't > know, but if there is a peek in a frequency with a drop off in higher and > lower frequencies, aetheric energy will become somewhat solidified.**** > > ** ** > > Conversely if instead of a peak in the middle there is a rise toward one > end and a sudden cut off, energy will be moved either up or down, moving > energy down seems to solidity towards material and up frees energy from > matter into the aether, or so it seems.**** > > ** ** > > But lowering energy in this manner can create unplesant energy, raising > seems better.**** > > ** ** > > Additionally this image tries to take advantage of creating an > interference pattern, this can cause a great acceleration of energy.**** > > This can be done many ways, but if two parallel paths and one shorter > there will be an interference pattern between the 2, additionally if the > signal is slowed in one due to the conductor being different an > interference pattern will arise.**** > > ** ** > > There is more in just that image, but that is most of it**** > > ** ** > > John**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. <hoyt-stea...@cox.net> > wrote:**** > > Surprisingly enough, I did feel a warmth where it says "Feel over the > circle" even when I had my eyes closed and moved the image to a random > place first!**** > > What's your algorithm for designing these drawings?**** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* John Berry [mailto:berry.joh...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:40 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* [Vo]:New image, and site**** > > **** > > Hey, I have made a new image that might be more apparent for some.**** > > > And a website however basic/shoddy:**** > > **** > > http://aethericsciences.net78.net/**** > > **** > > The first image (after the text), open it up in a new window so it > displays are the correct size preferably.**** > > **** > > John**** > > ** ** >
