Daniel, I'm misunderstanding this reference of yours to the control with the empty reactor. If there's a gizmo, then I assume it's either in the power supply or the waveform generator. I suspect you're making a serious point that I'm missing here.
Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: Daniel Rocha To: John Milstone Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:02 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem But that would mean another device, a circuit, which modified the input when they compared with the empty reactor. 2013/5/21 Andrew <andrew...@att.net> I don't know if you are an EE in any way (I am), but irrelevant it is not. If the measurement probes only work up to 60 Hz and the majority of the power is being pumped at 200 Hz (arbitrary numbers), and the probes are 40 dB down at 200 Hz.... Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 6:25 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Andrew <andrew...@att.net> wrote: Rossi has stated that the input waveform is proprietary. Therefore the obvious question is whether these researchers were even allowed to look at it. I do not think they were allowed to look at it, but it is irrelevant. They measured the power going into the power supplies and wave form generator. Output power far exceeded all input power into the entire system. It does not matter what the power supplies did. - Jed -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com