It is not a violation of the fair use law.  If it were, basically every
professor I had in college would be liable for copyright violation.
Think of the money that these companies could get by just intimidating the
entire educational establishment.  And why don't these companies do it,
when there is such money on the table?  Because the law does not support
their case.

Companies can go after all kinds of organizations or people that frighten
off at the sound of the word "lawsuit", but they stop at the fence when
there's a legal department in that organization.  Because they know, the
law does not support their position.  They are simply using intimidation
for their own purposes.  That's the difference between Law and Corporate
practices in the field.




On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I just checked the article I reposted here on Vortex and I was wrong, it
>> did include pictures.  That was not my intent -- only the text.
>>
>
> "Only the text" is also a violation. You should apologize. It will go off
> into the sunset faster if you would apologize.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to