Andrew <andrew...@att.net> wrote: ** > You're saying that the measured emissivity value is trustworthy, and I'm > willing to buy that . . . >
Then you completely misunderstand. In the first test, the number is *not*"trustworthy." It is arbitrary. It is set to the lowest possible value. In the second test it is set to the actual value. We know this is trustworthy because they confirmed the calculated surface temperature by measuring the actual surface temperature directly with a thermocouple. WHY is this so difficult to understand?!? Many things in cold fusion experiments are difficult to grasp, but this is grade-school level science. - Jed
