Do you believe that, by fiddling with the exponent n and the emissivity e, you
can show that P could be in actuality 3 times lower (roughly) than is
calculated in the report? For if you can, then you've reduced COP to unity.
Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: Joshua Cude
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:18 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>
wrote:
Josh questions:
“I'm talking about the December test, when a different paint was used. I
don't think we know anything about the emissivity of that paint, nor its
dependence on wavelength.”
You could just as easily do a 30 second search and FIND THE ANSWER!
Since we don't know what the paint was, I don't think we can find the answer.
I found a black coating with an emissivity of .08 to .25. I agree, most black
paints are much higher, but Rossi may have spent more than 30 seconds to find
something that suited his purpose.
