On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Both HTSC and CF were discovered before their time both > are very different from what was thought in the moments > of discovery and both need new tools, concepts and ideas > in order to be understood.. > The validity of the HTSC evidence says nothing about the validity of the cold fusion evidence though. HTSC shows that mainstream science is perfectly willing to accept experimental results without a theory to explain them. Therefore the rejection by the same mainstream of cold fusion-- a far more desirable phenomenon -- should be given *more* credence, not less. >
