Rob wrote:
It should read 3P3W mode (page 12) and not in 3P4W mode Yes indeed. But why are the tensions around 237 V and not around 400 V AC? They switched the instrument in 3P3W mode, but being incompetent (my opinion) they connected only two wires to the phases but one to the neutral. The result can be seen on the display of the PCE830 computer: a complete garbage. Frequency: 5.3 Hz! a negative pf, V31 beeing 6.3 V AC and so on. Never seen such a garbage on a similar instrument. And nobody of the experts present and co-authors saw this, only internet blogger weeks later. And only because swiss associates of Rossi published proudly the picture on their "Net journal" and someone else showed the embarassing an revealing picture on another page (later replaced by James Bond and Dr. No). By the way: it is now obvious, that the resistors were placed between the phases. Look at picture "figure 5" in the Levi report. We see that two white cable of two different resistors (2 out of 3 in total, the third is on the right side) are connected to a single wire of the power supply. If you connect 3 resistors from phase to neutral, you would expect in one case 3 white wires connected to one point (neutral) and every other white cable would be connected to a single wire of the power supply. This is confirmed by the fact that they switched the instrument in 3P3W mode (V12 V23 V31). It is also confirmend by Rossi himself who spoke about "380 V". I conclude that the test in december was made so badly, that the authors should retract. The youger among them are risking their future career. And about the march test, i have also a hypothesis. But i prefer to wait.
