Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
--- On Wed, 5/29/13, Claudio C Fiorini <claudio.c.fior...@gmail.com> wrote: From: Claudio C Fiorini <claudio.c.fior...@gmail.com> Subject: Re:[Vo]:PCE-830 manual and 3 phases measurement To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Wednesday, May 29, 2013, 7:19 AM Rob wrote: It should read 3P3W mode (page 12) and not in 3P4W mode Yes indeed. But why are the tensions around 237 V and not around 400 V AC? Perhaps this is a form of interphasal voltage measurement. I see here that the numbers are close to a 1/1.7 ratio. Sometimes these things(interphasal Circuit experimentation) take unusual pathways of the circuits displaying a zero point value, and yet being part of a seeming conveyance of energy, and it still seems remarkable that the voltage does not distribute itself linearly so that the "delivery wires" share in losses in the reaching of a load. However "if" a load was inserted at this point, the intervening capacitors would then be obliged to share the currents and voltage distribution. Say I have two capacitors, each with only one side hooked to the power supply and they both read zero volts. Now I take a third voltage meter and measure the ends of those caps reading zero volts across them. Is there anyone who thinks that only zero volts must come out the other free endings? Well I did this with an 11 volt alternator demo. We wanted to see what the open circuit voltage delivery from the source would be, so we disabled each delta load at the midpoints, so that no amperage was permitted on that phase. These were LC resonant circuits exhibiting voltage rise, so those meters were labeled V(i) for internal voltage rise, and they were placed across the caps. The other meters are cap open lead voltage readings. So what happens is that we have three 11 volt sources attached on one side only to three caps labeled 1V(i),2V(i),3V(i) all reading zero. Now attached to the former endings are the interphasal voltage meters (1-2),(2-3),(1-3) ALL READING 11 VOLTS AND OVER. This shown at 1:30 in the video ~60% Voltage Kickback from Load to Stator Source(ph3) http://youtu.be/8LUVyus1Yzg SO APPARENTLY TWO ZERO VOLT SIGNALS EACH SOURCED FROM DIFFERENT TIME ZONES OF ACTION, CAN STILL CONVEY THE INSTANTANEOUS VOLTAGE DIFFERENCES PRESENT BETWEEN THOSE SOURCES PRODUCING ZERO VOLTS! So then we can have both a voltage made by charge separation or motionally induced emf as in the three phase alternator case, AND an extra voltage present due to time separation of signals.However the special thing about this is there must be an internal voltage rise against itself within the phase itself as the LC components midpoint rise in voltage; for that quantity to be measured with respect to the timing of another phase having the same resonant rise of voltage, where duplication of phase angles would be considered the norm. Thus having three 1 volt signals each having acting Q factors of 10 would show 10 volts on the outer phasal triangle, and 17 volts on the inner phasal interior triangle. They switched the instrument in 3P3W mode, but being incompetent (my opinion) they connected only two wires to the phases but one to the neutral. The result can be seen on the display of the PCE830 computer: a complete garbage. Frequency: 5.3 Hz! a negative pf, V31 beeing 6.3 V AC and so on. Never seen such a garbage on a similar instrument. And nobody of the experts present and co-authors saw this, only internet blogger weeks later. And only because swiss associates of Rossi published proudly the picture on their "Net journal" and someone else showed the embarassing an revealing picture on another page (later replaced by James Bond and Dr. No). By the way: it is now obvious, that the resistors were placed between the phases. Look at picture "figure 5" in the Levi report. We see that two white cable of two different resistors (2 out of 3 in total, the third is on the right side) are connected to a single wire of the power supply. If you connect 3 resistors from phase to neutral, you would expect in one case 3 white wires connected to one point (neutral) and every other white cable would be connected to a single wire of the power supply. This is confirmed by the fact that they switched the instrument in 3P3W mode (V12 V23 V31). It is also confirmend by Rossi himself who spoke about "380 V". I conclude that the test in december was made so badly, that the authors should retract. The youger among them are risking their future career. And about the march test, i have also a hypothesis. But i prefer to wait.
