OK, David I have the impression you are an experienced man, what else can be done than testing the duration, solve the material problems, and improve the system? And this was done and will be continued in the professional way. Est modus in rebus. Peter
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > It has been apparent to me for a long time that DGT uses a different > method for generation of heat than does Rossi. Both techniques appear to > work. > > The main question is whether or not one of the processes has a > significantly long life span before internal damage makes it require > maintenance. Of course the cost of manufacturing is important as well. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vorl Bek <vorl....@antichef.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Sat, Jun 1, 2013 7:28 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion > > On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 06:52:44 -0400 > Ron Kita <chiralex.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Greeting Vortex-L > > > > Boring.... > > http://www.lenrnews.eu/ > > Are you kidding? This blows Rossi out of the water. > > [quote] > The good-news claim is that DGT can control their multi-stage > dynamic process. We observed their fifth-generation apparatus being > ramped up in minutes instead of taking hours or days to reach > levels of heat output several times higher than equivalent energy > input of electricity....All that's needed to stop the reactor from > producing excess heat energy is to switch off those currents that > create plasma. > [/quote] > > No crazy "apply more heat to make it stop" nonsense. > > This sounds like the real deal. > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
