It may have been that LENR is too complex for biology to have taken advantage of it. Also it may have caused DNA damage too difficult to overcome for biological systems. Either way, the fact that it is not widespread is accepted, but arguing from that fact that biological systems should be one way or another is an invalid classic fallacy, the argument from silence.
On 6/9/13, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > The subject say it all, really: 'Yet Another LENR "Miracle": Evolution > Didn't Find It' > > If an energy source as abundant and ubiquitous as LENR appears to be > exists, why wouldn't evolution have found ways of creating the NAE (nuclear > active environment)? If you say "It did." then you have to explain why the > manifest evolutionary advantages of such an energy source didn't cause it > to become wide-spread enough to have baffled biochemists in the course of > their analysis of metabolism. >
