Alan, Have you tried your model with what I think is the most likely method of fraud: running full current through the supposedly "dead" 3rd phase wire?
This would change the power input from an an average of 266 Watts (800 Watts * 0.33) to 666 Watts (800 Watts * 0.33 + 400 Watts * 1.0). This would produce an apparent COP of 2.5 (avg 666 Watts vs avg 266 Watts), which is just what the testers reported. John ________________________________ From: Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: About the March test > From: "Andrew" <andrew...@att.net> > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 3:45:27 PM > > 2. The report shows the device temperature varying synchronously, up > to a small phase lag, with the pulses. This is expected behaviour. The general fluctuation is expected, but the SHAPE of the curve is consistent only with a TRIANGULAR 150-sec rise, 150-sec fall (or possibly sawtooth) wave. It is NOT consistent with a DC offset applied either through the heater or the central reactor cylinder. (I have to check what a triangle applied to the heater would look like. I guess I should also try a 1/450 hz sine wave).
