I believe the nature of quantum gravity makes certain that there will always be uncertainty. If we want more certainty in our lives we need to go to an area of spacetime with a lower energy gravity field with less energetic quantum particles. It might be boring though, as our lives currently unfold each day from our Sun.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:45 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Reading that page I came across: "In peril is the notion of > “naturalness,” Albert Einstein’s dream that the laws of nature are > sublimely beautiful, inevitable and self-contained. Without it, physicists > face the harsh prospect that those laws are just an arbitrary, messy > outcome of random fluctuations in the fabric of space and time." > > This is precisely what I have been saying abut engineering the aether > causes the rules to change! > Consider the Hutchinson effect, or the inexplicable qualities of cold > fusion's 'NAE's. > > Additionally there is evidence of biological transmutation, which appears > impossible from a conventional perspective of the conditions required. > > John > > > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 12:28 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > >> In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 22 Jun 2013 16:30:39 -0400: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> > >> https://www.simonsfoundation.org/features/science-news/is-nature-unnatural/ >> > >> >"On an overcast afternoon in late April, physics professors and >> >students crowded into a wood-paneled lecture hall at Columbia >> >University for a talk by Nima Arkani-Hamed, a high-profile theorist >> >visiting from the Institute for Advanced Study in nearby Princeton, >> >N.J. With his dark, shoulder-length hair shoved behind his ears, >> >Arkani-Hamed laid out the dual, seemingly contradictory implications >> >of recent experimental results at the Large Hadron Collider in Europe. >> > >> >“The universe is inevitable,” he declared. “The universe is impossible.” >> > >> >The spectacular discovery of the Higgs boson in July 2012 confirmed a >> >nearly 50-year-old theory of how elementary particles acquire mass, >> >which enables them to form big structures such as galaxies and humans. >> >“The fact that it was seen more or less where we expected to find it >> >is a triumph for experiment, it’s a triumph for theory, and it’s an >> >indication that physics works,” Arkani-Hamed told the crowd. >> > >> >However, in order for the Higgs boson to make sense with the mass (or >> >equivalent energy) it was determined to have, the LHC needed to find a >> >swarm of other particles, too. None turned up." >> >> >> Hmm. Do I smell an "Ultraviolet Catastrophe" in the wind? >> >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> >
