Provocative paper - if I could understand the LENR implications, this would be a good time to try to fit them into current events, especially if there exists this surprisingly strong magnetic component - as DGT wants us to believe. Let's hope they quantify it soon.
In fact, the purpose of this post is to encourage you to take a stab at
bringing theory down to earth.
Many of us here have been intrigued by Don Hotson's explication of Dirac -
since it reduces complex mathematics to an understandable level by laymen.
And anyone who looks at these things deeply ends up realizing that Dirac was
the man. Apparently you have taken that a step further. Do you have a "joe
the plumber" version of how magnetic charge gets involved in LENR, and
especially how an aligned field would not just persist, but intensify - past
the Curie point?
Jones
From: Danny Ross Lunsford
We should keep calling it cold fusion, and make a barbed
point of it, in honor of Fleischmann, who admittedly hated the term. Why? To
stick it to the people who hounded him and smirched his reputation. Cold
fusion yesterday, today, and forever! Fly the flag!
MEANWHILE - I am ultra-intrigued by the magnetic anomalies
mentioned. I'm working on a new approach to magnetic currents. See here:
http://www.academia.edu/470454/Some_New_Thoughts_on_Magnetic_Charge
The paper has some problems in the analysis of potential
theory that I'm fixing, but the main conclusion stands - magnetic currents
if they exist cannot be represented by simple monopoles and a vector
potential. The field put forward here is new physics.
-----------------------------------------------
"I write a little. I erase a lot." - Chopin
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
