I am depressed and saddened by the lack of trust shown here; trust in one of the most emanate field marshals on the battlefield in the struggle to advance the interests of LENR. Doesn’t Defkalion have enough enemies from vested interests? Do they deserve abuse from supposed friends of the LENR cause? This field strength is true because John H has stated it in public.
There have been many derogatory words spoken here to undercut Defkalion coming from this list for no good reason that I can tell. There has been detailed data presented by Dr, Kim on radiation in the ICCF paper and you chose to disbelieve it. What right do you have to expect more data for another ill-informed prejudiced evaluation of what Defkalion truthfully and publically states in the future, On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If some inconvenient fact does not fit into one's train of ideas and >> theories, just ignore it or even discredit it regardless if that fact may >> well be the turnkey to unlocking the ultimate truth. >> > > I will ignore the weird tone of this reply and just address the points of > detail. What "fact" are you referring to? The magnetic field? How do you > know this is a fact at this point? And how does it unlock ultimate truth? > How is it being discredited? A reply that involves magnetic anapoles is a > non sequitur as far as I am concerned. This is a question about > experimental empirical details, not theory. > > With regard to the magnetic field, at this point we don't have enough > information to base our usual speculations off of. There are a number of > possibilities and too little data to narrow things down. One possibility > is that every word of hearsay that has been spoken on behalf of Defkalion > on this list so far is right on the mark. Another is that there is a lot > of radiation coming off of that device, which would be an inconvenient > thing, but unsurprising to me. A third possibility is that there is > something else entirely going on. > > I see how almost two years were spent pondering the question of nickel > isotopes. That, from a suggestion of Rossi sometime back in a forum, if I > recall. As far as I can tell, that conversation was largely a wash. It > was instructive, to be sure, but perhaps irrelevant (we still don't know > for sure). We still wonder about it from time to time. It is all too easy > for a person to drop in new tidbits of hearsay -- for example, "I > understand that Defkalion are using a square wave signal for the Joule > heating." Hopefully we won't ponder on that possibility for two years now, > because I made it up completely. > > Eric > >
