Let me be clear though, I think Defkalion could turn this situation around. Go out strong with Luca (or someone with equal credibility, he's not the only physics PHD with a track record in the world) leading a *simple and clear demonstration* that proves the tech.
Allow for a tear down afterwards of everything that shows all the stuff they showed in previous videos regarding the innards. Don't have to do chemical breakdowns of the 'confidential area', but at least let people see all the parts. And if that demo doesn't work perfectly, just do another one that takes into account the criticisms. I think a plan for 3 or 4 demos over a month or so, each addressing all the concerns from the previous is a perfect way to get the extraordinary evidence required. That way, when they go public, their stock price will rocket super high and they can use it invest / hire / acquire great talent and tech to make their company invincible. However, if they go with just what they have so far, I believe they will just end up attracting a lot of me tos who will see their weak demos and feel they will be able to do a better job. These competitors will get money for investment and once their companies start they won't be able to stop. They will write up patents as fast as possible. With a weak IPO, Defkalion will just end up creating a lot of competitors and not much else who will provide alternative investing opportunities and forever undermine their stock offering. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:42 AM, blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com>wrote: > Well, then fortunately it will be a great short selling opportunity! > Always on the look out for such things. > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> He cannot do such thing, fortunately. >> >> >> 2013/8/12 blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> >> >>> Right now, given that Luca (the only known physics PHd with a track >>> record in the bunch) has suspended biz in Italy due to inconsistencies on >>> the testing, I'm betting incompetence / fraud, but I think a really good >>> test by Defkalion with indie observers (especially a videotaped one) will >>> turn that around significantly. >>> >> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> danieldi...@gmail.com >> > >
