Good comment, Jones. I totally agree with you. Unfortunately, the well was poisoned from the start by the US patent office refusal to accept ANY patent for many years and the DOE panel by its one sided conclusion, both of which created a legal situation that doomed any serious study of CF. Now the expected and natural consequences are being experienced. Rossi may eventually be the last man standing because he found the secret recipe and used his own money to start the process. His approach, while looking crazy by conventional standards, might be the winning path for this technology.

Ed
On Aug 13, 2013, at 8:11 AM, Jones Beene wrote:

You are correct AF. There is little way for any outside investor to benefit from a DGT stock offering - no matter what they have... and I think that they do have a valid thermal anomaly in the early stages of development.

It will be a laugh to see how many billions of shares they have available. Here is a document on Canadian legal requirements which indicates that they must have actually filed a prospectus even before as they were moving to Vancouver - and included a lot of facts which they probably would rather
keep silent about:

books.google.com/books?isbn=1553672070

Where is their prospectus? It should be enlightening to read it - in the
context of what we know to be historically true.

We tend to forget that it is entirely possible to build a deliberate scam on top of valid energy anomaly (especially an anomaly discovered and patented
by someone else).

Even if everything which DGT showed the world on the Internet in Italy was basically accurate as to the thermal anomaly, a stock offering in November is premature and doomed by circumstances. This can only be a net negative
for the rest of the field. It is called "poisoning the well".

DGT are a minimum of three years from a commercial product and much longer from mass production. They have no valid patent. Their process seems to infringe on half a dozen patent applications, which have preceded them. No VC will touch them. The lifetime of the unit is unknown, even if the energy
is strongly anomalous for a few days. The list goes on-and-on.

If they had anything valid at all, and let me repeat - I believe that they do have something valid but it was invented elsewhere - then they should proceed to try to understand the phenomenon better through a University or Government, and that happens only by abandoning a brain-dead business plan,
which is most of the problem.

It is the kind of business plan that a scammer would device - not a
scientist.

        

Reply via email to