Axil, the question is, Exactly what behavior did the experiment show?.
DGE claims to have measured a magnetic FIELD of 1.6 T. Such an intense
magnetic field cannot form under the circumstances. Therefore, they
misinterpreted the behavior. The problem is to discover just what they
actually observed. Instead, people assume the claim is correct and
proceed to explain it by applying a theory. Obviously, these theories
can explain anything even if the observation has no relationship to
reality. Consequently, this exercise is a waste of time and the so
called theories have no value. Until DGT provides real data, we have
no reality to discuss.
Ed
On Aug 12, 2013, at 12:14 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Regarding your theories and the magnetic behavior of the Ni/H
reactors of both Defkalion and Rossi:
"It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter
how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong".
Richard P. Feynman
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Edmund Storms
<stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Why do you discuss any thing on vortex? Why do you even comment
since we are all engaging in random curiosity about everything?
You make no sense. RF is not identified as a magnetic field. The
impression given is of a constant magnetic field being generated. If
you know this is not true, why would you not say so?
Ed
On Aug 12, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Why should I do anything to satisfy any random curiosity! There is
public knowledge of magnetic field, at least in the form of RF from
ICCF - 13, which is correlated with COP enhancement by over 10x.
2013/8/12 Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>
The time out refers to discussion by people on Vortex who have no
knowledge about the issue. Do you have inside knowledge that you
will kindly provide?
Ed
On Aug 12, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
The only fact it is that you do not accept. There is no error and
since this is a random complaint, don't expect them to them to
listen to you any time soon. There is no time out and no delay in
business.
2013/8/12 Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>
The time out is necessary for this obvious error to be explained
and corrected.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
