I agree with you. You see, the intention of making a huge amplifying effect is a strong arcing. But, what I notice it is that it seems that a current breakdown before achieving the desired effect.
2013/8/22 Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> > Dan,**** > > I’m not sure arcing is really a flaw, it may be a feature. Arcing > may be needed to keep up the population of monatomic hydrogen. Periods of > “time” in this environment may also be misleading considering the claims of > anomalous decay rates for radioactive gas.**** > > Fran **** > > ** ** > > *From:* Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 22, 2013 1:56 AM > *To:* John Milstone > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Nanoplasmonic EMF enhancement**** > > ** ** > > And what is this anapole has to do with reaching the strong enhancement? I > don't see any relation. The fractal relation for amplification will just > work effectively for a small period of time. Any more and all will get are > weak arcing going from tree to sub-tree, randomly.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ**** > > danieldi...@gmail.com**** > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
