Any reproducible anomaly is not before its time. It is always right on time for scientists. Its what they crave. The problem is we don't have a yeoman class<http://jimbowery.blogspot.com/2007/01/yeomen-as-foundation-of-scientific.html>anymore.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am getting a bad feeling that LENR is still here way before its time. > Science is not at a stage that will accept LENR as a possibility. It looks > to me like magnetism is a key factor in the quantum mechanical processes at > the heart of the disruption of nuclear stability. > > Looking back at the recent history of experimental and theoretical physics > that occurred in the mid 1990’s, magnetism turned out to be the primary > causative factor in the weird and hard to understand experimental results > that first revealed the quantum hall effect. Experiments showed that > resistance could be quantized when electrons were highly constrained > dimensionally and were also acted on by a strong magnetic field. > > Even weirder, electric charge could be fractionalized when electrons were > exposed to a strong magnetic field. > > This process of electron charge fractionalization is very difficult to > visualize physically. So physicists have come up with a quasiparticle > concept called a composite fermion to depict what is happening to many > electrons affected by a strong magnetic field. > > Back then, the physics community was pained to explain this perplexing > experimental fractional charge result. But this experimental shock created > a new burst of innovation in string theory and quantum field theory which > is still nascent and not yet fully understood. > > There are still many perplexities in particle physics. > > Almost half a century ago, Yang and Mills introduced a remarkable new > framework to describe elementary particles using structures that also occur > in geometry. Quantum Yang-Mills theory is now the foundation of most of > elementary particle theory, and its predictions have been tested at many > experimental laboratories, but its mathematical foundation is still > unclear. The successful use of Yang-Mills theory to describe the strong > interactions of elementary particles depends on a subtle quantum mechanical > property called the "mass gap:" the quantum particles have positive masses, > even though the classical waves travel at the speed of light. This property > has been discovered by physicists from experiment and confirmed by computer > simulations, but it still has not been understood from a theoretical point > of view. Progress in establishing the existence of the Yang-Mills theory > and a mass gap and will require the introduction of fundamental new ideas > both in physics and in mathematics. > > The Clay Mathematics Institute American Mathematical Society has offered a > million dollar prize to anyone who can supply this new physics and > mathematics. > > http://www.claymath.org/library/monographs/MPPc.pdf > > This tells me that the theoretical and mathematical foundation that a > valid theory of LENR can be built on is not in place yet. > > LENR is very much like the fractionalized quantum Hall Effect (FQHE) in > that electrons and quarks are fermions. But where in the FQHE, the strong > directly applied magnetic field causes the charge of the electron to be cut > to factions and even completely eliminated, the strong magnetic fields > involved in LENR causes the charges of quarks to be greatly reduced or even > completely eliminated. > > When the charge and spin properties of the quarks in the nucleus are > disrupted in the nucleus, new quark configurations will after the strong > magnetic field is removed. This is the basis of transmutation and even > fusion. > > > Where theoretical physics finally realizes this experimental wonder that > is LENR, there will be a new rebirth in string and quantum field theory > thinking not unlike what is currently happening with the FQHE. > > > Theoretical physics has been alienated by completely inappropriate > theoretical explanations of LENR experimental results over the decades that > counter the current theoretical directions and aspirations of theoretical > physics. In this branch of conservative science, much damage to the > credibility of LENR has been done that can only be corrected by the Rossi > method of pushing experimental reality in the face of incomplete > theoretical physics through the release of a hitherto completely magical > and unexplained commercial product. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Dear Friends, >> >> I published now: >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/09/everything-i-knew-about-cold-fusion-was.html >> >> It is an appeal to a Paradigm Shift, actually I have published these >> ideas long ago, now I just made a synthesis of them. >> I am realist and I know this paper will have a limited impact, >> preponderemtly negative. I don't csre. I care for the future of LENR. >> LENR will be technological, or will not be. >> >> Peter >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > >
