Now I think you're the one being the cold fusion police. You're prejudging what 'cold fusion' must be.
Scientists sometimes make me think of Sunni vesus Shiite muslims. Or hell, muslims versus jews versus christians. They all believe in generally the same thing, but wow do they get petty about the little differences. On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:59 PM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: > Blaze, > > You are being too kind to Nature. > Pyroelectric fusion is still hot fusion, albeit in a larger cool > environment. > > -- Lou Pagnucco > > Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > Nature isn't too hard on Cold Fusion. They did publish this important > > paper on Pyroelectric fusion: > > > > http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v434/n7037/full/nature03575.html > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: > > > >> At 09:02 PM 10/9/2013, you wrote: > >> > >>> Tabletop fusion reactor mimics cosmic-ray crashes > >>> http://www.nature.com/ncomms/**2013/131008/ncomms3506/full/** > >>> ncomms3506.html< > http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3506/full/ncomms3506.html> > >>> > >> > >> I guess Nature's Cold Fusion police haven't been informed of the new > >> name : > >> > >> > >> "Beyond fusion, our approach demonstrates a new means for exploring *** > >> low-energy nuclear reactions *** such as those that occur in > >> astrophysical > >> plasmas and related environments." > >> > >> > > > > >
