Well, yes I agree see http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131205142218.htm on wormholes, entanglement and the effect on quarks as basis for a global gravitation theory and spooky action at a distance. Teleportation and instantaneous communication between Bob and Alice thru entanglement. Although the paper only deals with subatomic particles my posit is that the quantum effects of Casimir geometry segregate vacuum density regions inside vs exterior surfaces such that this same effect scales up or down - dynamic changes in gravity breaking the isotropy and relativistic effects leading to decay rate anomalies without near C velocity. If the current radioactive decay rate anomalies are due to the geometry and you consider the exposed to geometry duty factor vs the entire volume of gas being measured then the relativistic effects are actually much higher and being averaged down by circulation path and gas populating and pressurizing the less extreme geometry to facilitate the loading. I think LENR will lead to a new relativistic understanding of catalysis and Casimir effect. Getting back to a free energy self assembled Maxwellian demon this context would focus on the geometry segregating regions where vacuum wavelengths are either stretched or compressed from our perspective but negative or positive time dilation from a relativistic perspective at no energy cost! It is setting the stage for "sorting" gas atoms that are already harnessing zero point in the form of random motion.. no help sorting hot from cold but my posit remains that gas molecules formed in one time frame / fractional orbit oppose random motion to a different frame / fractional value which discounts the disassociation threshold. I like to visualize the covalent bonded orbitals of different fractional molecules as having their orbitals at different angles like butterfly wings where a normal gas molecule orbitals appear flat while an extreme 1/137 fractional molecule would be like the wings straight up parallel to each other and hence appearing smaller from our perspective above. The discount to disassociation threshold is only my pet theory but the relativistic hydrino paper from Naudts has been around since 05 and could be applied to recent threads about transmutation rates in these same regions... It all keeps pointing back to TIME. Fran
-----Original Message----- From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com [mailto:pagnu...@htdconnect.com] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 12:59 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:More versatile Maxwell's demons Fran, An interesting perspective. Perhaps related to a paper in my stack (which I have yet only perused)? - "Quantum Measurement Information as a key to Energy Release from Local Vacuums" - Masahiro Hotta http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.2272 (His other papers at arxiv.org/find/quant-ph/1/au:+Hotta_M/0/1/0/all/0/1) Still a contentious topic, but, hopefully, vacuum energy can be extracted. -- Lou Pagnucco Roarty, Francis X wrote: > Lou, > I have ben positing this with respect to DCE, the change in casimir > geometry and therefore the restriction of virtual particle sizes is > just such a Maxwellian demon. Powered by change in geometry it creates > boundaries that react asymmetrically to atoms vs molecules. It doesn't > sort hot from cold but it sets the stage for discounting the > disassociation level of molecules while ignoring atoms. If the area is > heated such that the molecules approach disassociation this > asymmetrical opposition to molecules will discount the threshold > opening the door to over unity at the cost of geometry. I am convinced > more heat can be released upon reassociation then the discounted value > achieved by geometry and random motion of gas. You are essentially > putting the random motion of gas in opposition to these geometrical boundaries. > Fran > > -----Original Message----- > From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com [mailto:pagnu...@htdconnect.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 11:53 PM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:More versatile Maxwell's demons > > Those interested in thermodynamics may find the following worthwhile: > > Some recent papers showing that Maxwell's demon may not require energy > - > > "Single-reservoir heat engine: Controlling the spin" > http://fqmt.fzu.cz/13/pdfabstracts/605_1f.pdf > > "Beyond Landauer Erasure" > http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/11/4956 > > The latter is part of the journal 'Entropy' > - Special Issue "Maxwell's Demon 2013" > http://www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy/special_issues/maxwells_demon2013 > > The following paper shows that computation needs no energy - if > reversible. > "The Connection between Reversibility and Heat Generation" > http://people.ccmr.cornell.edu/~clh/p562/TPH/Bohn_TP.pdf > > Whether a spin (or other conserved quantity) reservoir can be created > (or > discovered) for less than the thermodynamic energy it returns in a > novel engine is an intriguing question - and, also whether such > engines can be scaled to macroscopic size. > > -- Lou Pagnucco > > > > >
