2014/1/7 Axil Axil <[email protected]> > The author contacted some scientists working in the ‘hot’ fusion fields > who stated that Andrea Rossi could not possibly be achieving nuclear fusion > within his system based on the currently understood laws of physics. One > scientist stated that what Rossi does belongs in the category of > charlatanism.
Beaudette bash that argument showing how unscientific it is. he sais nearly all but 4, critics of Fleischmann were pure theory-based, with no critic on the experiment. the problem is that that pathological reasoning is deeply entrenched in pretended-scientists minds, in most educated people minds (less for some non-academic technical professions like engineer, chemist, industry scientists) - an experiment violate known theory (in fact no, just their way to use it) - so it is an artifact - if not possible to be an artifact, it is a fraud you can translate as: - no way to refute theory thus those scientists are not scientific, they are dogmatic Huizenga wrote it nearly that way. so shocking they cannot see they are simply violating scientific method, blatantly... colorblind in a sea of ref flag
