BLP being real or not, here is something that I find intriguing, http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0507193 QUOTE The Klein-Gordon equation of the hydrogen atom has a low-lying eigenstate, called hydrino state, with square integrable wavefunction. The corresponding spinor solution of Dirac's equation is not square integrable. For this reason the hydrino state has been rejected in the early days of quantum mechanics as being unphysical. Maybe it is time to change opinion. UNQUOTE
Can we spin on this? Note 1. Not being square integrable means probably that the wave function has "thick tails" and that it basically describes a non-localized electron that happens to get close very very seldom. E.g. quite an unlikely state. 2. Solutions to Klein Gordon equations is most probably a combination of spinor states for which the thick tails cancels. This may mean that you can have a hydrino state, but it's basically impossible to reach it because it depends on a delicate balance. But what if we combine a cluster of N hydrogen atoms, what happens then?, well we could view this as a possibility to bend the space into a compact manifolds of various forms and for applying these states on that system, one could perhaps trigger the formation of these hydrino states, for that case one would expect the electron will be partly bound closely, more closely than ordinary hydrogen but also have a component of delocalisation e.g. an affinity for the system to behave as a strongly coupled system just as with a BEQ state. So assuming the active sites have an ability to catalyze clusters of hydrino clusters, the next step to take is to note that for these hydrino clusters that could very well be close in nature to BEQ clusters, but more combact due to the close proximity of the electrons to the nucleus, the mechanism Kim describes could very well trigger nuclear reactions. At least that's my 2c of what's happens. Have fun! On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > In earlier BLP filings - on what constitutes a hydrino catalyst, it > turned out to be possible to fit two thirds of the periodic table into > their expansive definition. Talk about “over-reaching” … > > > > USPTO examiners detest these painfully long and over-reaching > applications. Many observers have commented on how poorly worded BLP’s > efforts turn out - and how little value they actually have in defensible > IP, having paid top dollar for poor work. BLP will probably not fare well > if it ever comes to litigation. > > > > A few years ago it was noted here that the company had overlooked “gas > phase” in all of their voluminous filings – that is, up until Rossi’s > patent application showed up in which his claim was for only gas phase… at > which time BLP altered a previous filing, once which had only claimed > liquid and plasma phase, to include gas phase. It was obvious that they > were trying to cover up a glaring mistake in coverage. > > > > I suppose that they were hoping no one would take notice, but instead the > effect was to announce to the world how badly they had screwed up. > > > > *From:* David Roberson > > > > It appears to me that they have most of the possible current levels > covered. Why list ranges that include each other? > > Magnetic fields that are changing in magnitude or direction generate > electric fields that can impart energy upon charged particles. A steady > magnetic field is not able to supply energy to these charged objects, but > can change their direction of motion. > > Dave > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > The BLP website is down as I write this, but yesterday the > > "What’s New" tab on their homepage led to this entry dated 1/14/14 - > > > > Patent Application – Power Generation Systems and Methods Regarding Same. > > http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/Power%20Generation%20Systems%20and%20Methods%20Patent%20Application.pdf > > > > I am unsure whether this untitled 324 page document is an existing > > patent application, one just submitted, or is pending submission. > > > > What I found especially interesting is that it credits the anomalous > > energy generation, and hydrino formation to an extremely wide range of > > plasma currents, and current pulse widths. For example, on p.107, > > the following excerpt appears - > > > > "The current density may be in the range of at least one of > > 100A/cm^2 to 1,000,000 A/cm^2, 1000 A/cm^2 to 100,000 A/cm^2, > > [...] > > The pulse time may be in at least one range chosen from about > > 10^-6 s to 10s, 10^-5s to 1s, 10^-4s to 0.1s, and 10^-3s to 0.01s. > > [...] > > The magnetic flux may be in the range of about 10 G to 10 T, > > 100 G to 5 T, or 1 kG to 1 T." > > > > The huge current densities and sharp rise/fall times should create > > very large magnetic forces that, if focused, impart huge momenta > > and energies to charged particles that are in, or impacted, by the > > plasma current filaments. > > > > Possibly, BLP's upcoming demo will be a more systemic version of > > the 1922 Wendt-Irion experiment that vindicates W-I's conclusions? > > > > -- Lou Pagnucco > > > > > > > >
