Does that nullify my "aliens farting through a wormhole induced by coherent
EMF" theory of cold fusion?
On Sunday, January 19, 2014, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Thanks Frank … and BTW – for those not familiar with Frank’s
> observations … it should be mentioned, even though he did not, that this
> parameter space seems to be consistent (or within a close range) with
> “megahertz-meter” … no?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* fznidar...@aol.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'fznidar...@aol.com');>
>
>
>
> Brilliant work Jones.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jones Beene
>
> About 7 years ago here on Vortex - before the plasmon/polariton technology
>
> was being spread around cyberspace as being particularly relevant to some
>
> types of LENR (by NASA no less)- and long before the Rossi HotCat, we raised
>
> a relevant issue called "triple coherency".
>
>
>
> Basically, the question was posed: What would happens if one can engineer a
>
> constant and coherent flux of three different forms of mass/energy within a
>
> closed reactor:
>
>
>
> 1) photons
>
> 2) electrons (local AC)
>
> 3) phonons
>
>
>
> And moreover would a "new kind of condensate" emerge? A 'new kind of
>
> condensate' means a macro-state in which we are not restricted by bosons or
>
> by near zero Kelvin temperatures, but are considering the next larger
>
> plateau of interlocking geometries, which are conjoined by abnormal but
>
> coherent energy dynamics at a higher level. It is misleading to refer to
>
> this as a BEC.
>
>
>
> Forcing all three parameters into some kind of mutual coherency (or
>
> superradiance) would be limited by several factors, mostly by the geometric
>
> excursion possibilities of the heaviest (densest) component: phonons.
>
>
