Ken-- Is Chris's grandfather Leon Cooper?
The following excerpt is from Wikipedia regarding Cooper Pairs. >>>n condensed matter physics, a Cooper pair or BCS pair is two electrons (or >>>other fermions) that are bound together at low temperatures in a certain >>>manner first described in 1956 by American physicist Leon Cooper.[1] Cooper >>>showed that an arbitrarily small attraction between electrons in a metal can >>>cause a paired state of electrons to have a lower energy than the Fermi >>>energy, which implies that the pair is bound. In conventional >>>superconductors, this attraction is due to the electron-phonon interaction. >>>The Cooper pair state is responsible for superconductivity, as described in >>>the BCS theory developed by John Bardeen, Leon Cooper, and John Schrieffer >>>for which they shared the 1972 Nobel Prize.[2] Although Cooper pairing is a quantum effect, the reason for the pairing can be seen from a simplified classical explanation.[2][3] An electron in a metal normally behaves as a free particle. The electron is repelled from other electrons due to their negative charge, but it also attracts the positive ions that make up the rigid lattice of the metal. This attraction distorts the ion lattice, moving the ions slightly toward the electron, increasing the positive charge density of the lattice in the vicinity. This positive charge can attract other electrons. At long distances this attraction between electrons due to the displaced ions can overcome the electrons' repulsion due to their negative charge, and cause them to pair up. The rigorous quantum mechanical explanation shows that the effect is due to electron-phonon interactions. The energy of the pairing interaction is quite weak, of the order of 10?3eV, and thermal energy can easily break the pairs. So only at low temperatures a significant number of the electrons in a metal are in Cooper pairs. The electrons in a pair are not necessarily close together; because the interaction is long range, paired electrons may still be many hundreds of nanometers apart. This distance is usually greater than the average interelectron distance, so many Cooper pairs can occupy the same space.[4] Electrons have spin-1?2, so they are fermions, but a Cooper pair is a composite boson as its total spin is integer (0 or 1). This means the wave functions are symmetric under particle interchange, and they are allowed to be in the same state. The tendency for all the Cooper pairs in a body to 'condense' into the same ground quantum state is responsible for the peculiar properties of superconductivity. The BCS theory is also applicable to other fermion systems, such as helium-3. Indeed, Cooper pairing is responsible for the superfluidity of helium-3 at low temperatures. It has also been recently demonstrated that a Cooper pair can comprise two bosons.[5] Here the pairing is supported by entanglement in an optical lattice.<<< Maybe the nanotubes support high temperature Cooper pairing. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Deboer To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 9:56 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Christopher H. Cooper" RE C. Cooper Hi, Found out a little bit about Chris Cooper. He was actually the founder of Seldon Technologies, which is based on his work with CNT's. He was trained in nuclear physics and may have a Ph., D. in it. He ( and maybe his father? William Cooper) have fairly recently written over a dozen patent apps, mostly on CNTs in various applications. The water purification technology, which is quite straightforward is described in this paper DeVolder M. et al 2013, Carbon nanotubes: Present and future commercial applications. Sci 339:534-9. I have been following various aspects of graphene for a little while for bionanotechnology apps, but mostly for the hell of it, but also always looking for its possible use as lattice materials, some of which was kindled by Jones' comments a while back on silicon carbide. Graphene can be made a number of ways, some of which involves splitting of carbon nanotubes to form ribbons, including tunable ones, 'armchair' and the like. It can also be made directly from silicon carbide (Peng et al 2013. Direct transformation of amorphous silicon carbide into graphene under low temperature and ambient pressure. Scientific reports 3(1148) FREE). Also they form Dirac cones which I gather, although I know nothing about them myself, are interesting. cheers, ken On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: Fran and Jones-- Maybe they make a thin substrate ( that H diffuses through, gouge out a line with a laser beam or electron beam, lay in the nanotubes and then make layers of the nanotube filled substrate film, sandwich these between good heat conductors with high magnetic susceptibility and finally fuse the assembly together in a plate-like array under temperature and pressure. That could do away with finding a geometric compound that naturally forms alternating geometries. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank roarty" <fr...@roarty.biz> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 6:37 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]:"Christopher H. Cooper" Jones, Yes, I agree.. the paper from Cornell re catalytic action only occurring at openings and defects in nano tubes would also lend support to your suspicion that he may be legit. He is in the correct industry and may have discovered a way to increase the defects thru self assembly that would surpass the random nature of the tubules approach. We know water molecules do some unique alignments when drawn thru a nano filter and we know multiwall nanotubes basically self assemble so perhaps he has married tubes to some geometric compound that naturally forms alternating geometries inside the nanotube..basically the Haisch- Modell tunnels but much smaller and self assembled. Fran _____________________________________________ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 3:37 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:"Christopher H. Cooper" Prolific inventor, possibly in LENR: "Christopher H. Cooper" https://www.google.com/search?tbo=p&tbm=pts&hl=en&q=ininventor:%22Christophe r+H.+Cooper%22 Is Chris legit ... or is he more of a patent troll? Over 200 hits and no known data or publications that I can find to back up the claims... at least the excess energy claims. No papers on LENR-CANR or elsewhere pop up on google. Here is why I ask - many of his filings are definitely LENR based, but there is not much evidence that any have been reduced to practice. Most of them seem to have been filed after the Rossi information about "tubules" or whatever it was. https://www.google.com/patents/US20110255644 However, he appears to be affiliated with a water filtration company, Seldon Technologies of Vermont, which seems to be a player in CNT filters - so it is quite possible that he stumbled onto the energy anomaly via other R&D. I would love to see the data - if there is any.