objection to what?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, and you can see that this is a different type of fusion/fission. I > don't get your objection. > > > 2014-03-28 15:02 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>: > > I understand fission to be a process where in all cases a external >> stimuli affects the disruption of the atomic nucleus. >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> How can you be sure that no compression is involved? >>> >>> >>> 2014-03-28 14:55 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> The reaction in this system is fission without any compression involved. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> But Nickel does absorb. And why can't EMF projection of force be more >>>>> easily done inside a lattice? Not that the lattice is fundamental here. >>>>> But >>>>> confinement for compression is. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>>>> danieldi...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>> danieldi...@gmail.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
