To the mechanisms I pointed out to you.
2014-03-28 15:06 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>: > objection to what? > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Well, and you can see that this is a different type of fusion/fission. I >> don't get your objection. >> >> >> 2014-03-28 15:02 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>: >> >> I understand fission to be a process where in all cases a external >>> stimuli affects the disruption of the atomic nucleus. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> How can you be sure that no compression is involved? >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-03-28 14:55 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> The reaction in this system is fission without any compression involved. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Daniel Rocha >>>>> <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> But Nickel does absorb. And why can't EMF projection of force be more >>>>>> easily done inside a lattice? Not that the lattice is fundamental here. >>>>>> But >>>>>> confinement for compression is. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>>>>> danieldi...@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>>> danieldi...@gmail.com >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> danieldi...@gmail.com >> > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
