Remember Jones Beene said: "Neutron decay is exothermic, but the stripping reaction itself - where the neutron is separated from deuterium involves kinetic energy depletion - *so yes, the net reaction is not necessarily gainful unless the kinetic energy of the deuteron is supplied in a gainful way, or unless the bond energy is depleted - such as in the nanocavity using a mechanism related to Casimir - cavity QM or spin coupling."*
The energy of magnetic field production is derived from the uncertainty principle in a optical cavity were the SPPs gathered are compressed. This mechanism is lossless. The gain comes from neutron decay. The fission energy to split the deuteron comes from the vacuum via the uncertainty principle. Through logical thinking this must be so, if the experimental data is to be believed. OK, you do not believe this experimental data. Give me an alternative explanation. On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > You forgot the deuteron. > > > 2014-03-28 21:24 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>: > > Take note: >> The neutron is about 0.2% more massive than a proton, which translates to >> an energy difference of 1.29 MeV. >> >> When a heavy particle becomes a lighter one, the mass difference (.2%) is >> converted to energy via E=MC^2. You have your signs confused. >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> That doesn't make sense. The total energy is negative, it's endodermic, >>> so this is not an explanation for cold fusion. >>> >>> >>> 2014-03-28 20:36 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> The decay of the neutron is associated with a quark >>> transformation<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/particles/qrkdec.html#c1>in >>> which a down quark is converted to an up by the weak interaction . The >>>> average lifetime of 10.3 min/0.693 = 14.9 minutes is surprisingly long for >>>> a particle decay that yields 1.29 MeV of energy. You could say that this >>>> decay is steeply "downhill" in energy and would be expected to proceed >>>> rapidly >>>> >>>> >>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>> danieldi...@gmail.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
