An electron is always a wave. That is why they can not be pinned to a spot in space. such a pinning would require infinite energy... The uncertainty principle.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Axil-- > > If an electron is standing still, is it a wave? I think it must have some > kinetic energy to become a wave. Lambda (l) = h/mv. If v is 0, l > goes to infinity. > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2014 9:26 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Mats Lewan book : An Impossible Invention > > SPP can be packed together in a volume in unlimited numbers because SPP > are BOSONS.. This produces a EMF soliton with a huge or unlimited amplitude > like a laser. In fact, SPP can produce strong laser radiation when the > quasi-particle breaks up. > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The electron and the photon are particles, but they are waves too. When >> the wavelengths of these two particles are equal, they combine together to >> form a composite waveform. >> >> By convention, when thought of as particles, these particles combine into >> quasi- particles. This is why the SPP is said to be a quasi-particle. >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Axil-- >>> >>> Why do you say a SPP is a wave--I think of it as a particle--like you >>> say a BOSON. Are BOSONs also unlimited in their loquaciousness as well >>> as strength? >>> >>> Bob >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >>> *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:55 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Mats Lewan book : An Impossible Invention >>> >>> The Surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) is a hybrid infrared/electron combo >>> wave. It has spin and most important ...IT IS A BOSON.. BOSON means >>> unlimited strength. That wave based spin produces the anapole magnetic >>> field when the SPP forms a soliton in a vortex. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Axil Axil-- >>>> >>>> You finally have seen the light--the EMF that is. >>>> >>>> I joined this Blog a little over 2 months ago with a bias that spin >>>> and magnetism are the keys to LENR. I have been exposed to a lot of ideas >>>> and some facts. I am even more biased now. >>>> >>>> Spin is an energy with a direction and can be controlled by a magnetic >>>> field. The magnetic field establishes the amount of energy (via spin) a >>>> particle can hold and the differential amounts it can give up or take up. >>>> The old timers thought the energy was akin to a spinning top's energy and >>>> angular momentum. I am beginning to think of it as a mini Vortex of a >>>> magnetic field more or less locally confined within a volume of space--the >>>> particle boundary. >>>> >>>> Clarifying what is happening is just a matter of thinking inside the >>>> boundary. >>>> >>>> Bob >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >>>> *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:05 PM >>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Mats Lewan book : An Impossible Invention >>>> >>>> Based on the time honored LENR causation concept of charge screening, >>>> LENR is posited to be an EMF process. Since charge is emergent from spin, >>>> and spin is the origin on magnetism. therefore. LENR is a magnetic based >>>> process at its root. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Ahern seems to believe magnetic effects are at the heart of LENR >>>>>> phenomena. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Each experimentalist and theorist has a pet theory about what is going >>>>> on. What is important is whether one is able to subjugate one's personal >>>>> hunches to a more objective and systematic pursuit of what is going on. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> He does not think nuclear reactions are involved. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This should be a warning sign that Dr. Ahern might not be seeing much >>>>> of interest. What seems clear is that some researchers get very >>>>> pronounced >>>>> results. >>>>> >>>>> Eric >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
