True, though it'll make you wonder what his view will be in another year or
two as well.

When you calculate the odds on an event you have to rely a lot on
journalists because they do a lot of the investigation for you.  One thing
I do with a journalists is see them report something I'm familiar with and
if they do a good job, then I have more confidence when they report
something I'm not familiar with.


On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Agreed.
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well that was a while ago now, no? Things can change over close to a
>>> years time. Not really that surprising to me.
>>>
>>
>> I think you mean he has reconsidered. Sometimes a person has one
>> impression during an event, but it seems different in retrospect. Also,
>> Defkalion was expected to follow-up on the test, but they never did.
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to