Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote:

Jed, do you really understand how the two valve one flowmeter works
> and can be used to multiply the flow reading/recordings ?If not, please
> ask a company that manufactures flowmeters and you will learn that reverse
> flow is not recorded.
>

If the reverse flow is not recorded then it was the forward flow repeated
several times for the same water. They observed a flow rate of 1 L/min when
the flow rate was zero, so obviously the flow meter was malfunctioning.
Gamberale measured the actual flow, with a stopwatch and cylinder, and he
discovered that the flowmeter is wrong. Do you dispute that? On what basis?

The president of Defkalion, Xanthoulis, agreed that it was not working. Why
do you dispute him? Do you know something that Xanthoulis does not know?

If the people at Defkalion could have answered Gamberale to show that the
flow meter was correct, why didn't they? Why did they say nothing, and do
nothing, while DE warned its customers that machine does not work, and then
went bankrupt? You seem to be suggesting that they have good data, and they
can prove the machine works, but rather than do this they threw away
hundreds of millions of dollars in potential business and drove their own
joint venture into bankruptcy. Why? This makes no sense.

If you, or the people at Defkalion, have any proof this machine works, I
suggest you reveal it now, before they end up in jail.

- Jed

Reply via email to